Thought this was a good showing considering it was a sweep:
"35. 2005: White Sox over Astros in four
Series leverage: 56th
Game leverage: 1st
By our series leverage index -- which measures how tight the World Series was -- this ranks just 56th all time. But the games themselves were outrageously good. By our game leverage index, this was the tightest collection of World Series games ever. Every game was either tied or within one run in the eighth inning or later. Every White Sox starter went at least seven innings. Compare that to the seven-game series between the Cubs and Cleveland in 2016, in which no starting pitcher went seven. The White Sox's 11-1 postseason record ended a World Series drought that was two years longer than the Red Sox's had been."
Overall, the rankings are pretty solid with some decent thought behind them:
https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/...AMgv7i-4x7BPOo
"35. 2005: White Sox over Astros in four
Series leverage: 56th
Game leverage: 1st
By our series leverage index -- which measures how tight the World Series was -- this ranks just 56th all time. But the games themselves were outrageously good. By our game leverage index, this was the tightest collection of World Series games ever. Every game was either tied or within one run in the eighth inning or later. Every White Sox starter went at least seven innings. Compare that to the seven-game series between the Cubs and Cleveland in 2016, in which no starting pitcher went seven. The White Sox's 11-1 postseason record ended a World Series drought that was two years longer than the Red Sox's had been."
Overall, the rankings are pretty solid with some decent thought behind them:
https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/...AMgv7i-4x7BPOo
Comment